Only in free societies would you
see a social pattern more similar to your own, where an individual is developed
according to their specific talents and abilities, rather than simply slotted
into a large social pattern for the convenience of the state. In free
societies, an individual’s talents and abilities are discerned early in their
development and are cultivated naturally according to the individual’s talents
and inclinations. This is done to bring forth the individual’s greatest
abilities and to cultivate Knowledge within them so they recognize their
strengths and their talents and their natural desire to express these constructively.
But this form of education
is very specific. It is very much focused on the individual.
You will
rarely ever see this in a large technological society that does not value the
capabilities of the individual beyond serving a specific and predesignated
social function.
Then, of
course, there is training in large technological societies for specific tasks,
where an individual will be taken from his or her parents and set into a special
kind of education that will completely mold them for a specific social
function. You would not see this in a society that is free and that is governed
with an emphasis on the individual and their potential and creativity.
This is
one of the reasons why free societies are much smaller. They do
not have the overbearing social demands of maintaining a large
infrastructure. And they do not have foreign establishments that
require very strict conformity where they would expose their members to foreign
influence and the powers of persuasion that exist in the Greater Community.
Free nations tend to be much smaller and much more inclusive. They must protect
their advantages from
influences
from beyond their world and from the many seductions of power that always exist
in engaging with other races that are unlike their own. Because
of the emphasis on individual development, free nations tend to cultivate very
high levels of creativity. Advancement in science
and technology, in ethics and spirituality, can be remarkably great in these
societies. The benefit to society is immense, giving them certain advantages
that large technological societies do not have. Yet these advantages invite
scrutiny and interest and inevitably the attempts at persuasion. That is why
small free nations again must remain extremely discreet. For they will
cultivate advantages that larger nations do not have, advantages that will be
seen to be of great value and interest to other nations that do not have the
same kind of social structure. This again is the problem of having wealth and
power in the Greater Community. This again is why the wise remain hidden, and
why wise societies remain hidden and extremely discreet.
Here you
can see the immense contrast with the human ideal of sharing
one’s wisdom freely and openly with the universe, of wanting to
express oneself everywhere one goes, to share one’s gifts wherever one goes
and to broadcast one’s talents, abilities and accomplishments. It is because
humanity has never had to develop a very high degree of discretion and
discernment that these motivations and ambitions still exist. If
humanity can evolve into a free nation in the universe, it will have to
be extremely discreet, and its greater talents and accomplishments will have to
be maintained beyond scrutiny in the Greater Community to as great a degree as
possible. Should you develop technological advancements or advancements in your
social structure or functioning, even advancements in the arts, much of this
will have to remain hidden from the scrutiny of foreign powers. A free nation
is always perceived as a threat to nations that are not free. The expressions
of a free nation are always seen as endangering the interests of large nations, where freedom is not practised
and is unknown.
No comments:
Post a Comment